Editing Derek's wiki test space (section)

==Comment box==
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0.1" style="text-align:left"
|-
! style="background:#efefef;" | Tip
|-
|Description&emsp; to our knowledge, the provable security property is often taught as being self evident and is not questioned on any level (recent advances in quantum hacking may be an exception; however, such attacks are based on discrepancies between the model and real systems as opposed to the security of the model itself). The commonly cited reason for no-cloning or quantum entanglement is very far from sufficient. Even in the technical literature, a  key is often regarded as perfect whenever it is used in an application. One main purpose of this paper is to correct such a misconception and to demonstrate how the imperfect generated key affects the security proofs themselves.
|}




{{Infobox 
|style      = border:     2px 
|bodystyle  = width:      350px 
|abovestyle = background: #c8ccd1
|datastyle  = text-align: left  

|above      = Comment box testing


|data1      = Description to our knowledge, the provable security property is often taught as being self evident and is not questioned on any level (recent advances in quantum hacking may be an exception; however, such attacks are based on discrepancies between the model and real systems as opposed to the security of the model itself). The commonly cited reason for no-cloning or quantum entanglement is very far from sufficient. Even in the technical literature, a  key is often regarded as perfect whenever it is used in an application. One main purpose of this paper is to correct such a misconception and to demonstrate how the imperfect generated key affects the security proofs themselves.

}}