Editing
Derek's wiki test space
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Test space== {|border=1 cellpadding=3 cellspacing=0 |- !Heading 1!!Heading 2 |- |Data 1||Data 2 |} ==Comment box== {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0.1" style="text-align:left" |- ! style="background:#efefef;" | Tip |- |Description  to our knowledge, the provable security property is often taught as being self evident and is not questioned on any level (recent advances in quantum hacking may be an exception; however, such attacks are based on discrepancies between the model and real systems as opposed to the security of the model itself). The commonly cited reason for no-cloning or quantum entanglement is very far from sufficient. Even in the technical literature, a key is often regarded as perfect whenever it is used in an application. One main purpose of this paper is to correct such a misconception and to demonstrate how the imperfect generated key affects the security proofs themselves. |} {{Infobox |style = border: 2px |bodystyle = width: 350px |abovestyle = background: #c8ccd1 |datastyle = text-align: left |above = Comment box testing |data1 = Description to our knowledge, the provable security property is often taught as being self evident and is not questioned on any level (recent advances in quantum hacking may be an exception; however, such attacks are based on discrepancies between the model and real systems as opposed to the security of the model itself). The commonly cited reason for no-cloning or quantum entanglement is very far from sufficient. Even in the technical literature, a key is often regarded as perfect whenever it is used in an application. One main purpose of this paper is to correct such a misconception and to demonstrate how the imperfect generated key affects the security proofs themselves. }} ==Symbol== __MATHJAX_NODOLLAR__ I owe you 20. I owe you $20 I owe you $20 ==Download test== * [[File: test.pdf]] ==Infoboxtest== {{Infobox |title = Infobox testing |image = [[Image:Code_1.jpg|200px]] |header1 = Main Heading |header2 = First set of data |label2 = Label |data2 = Data |header3 = Remove this line (optional) |label3 = More Label |data3 = More data }} OK this is the test bed for the u-beaut infobox. What a pain to install. For the record, I followed the info at this link: http://www.etcwiki.org/wiki/Mediawiki_template_guide Why the heck why isn't this a file you can just unpackage into a directory rather than having to manually create 20 files, I don't know. I owe you $20 ==More Testing== * <math>\int_a^y f(\alpha\,)\,dy</math> * <math>\int_b^y f(\alpha\,)\,dy,{\rm does~it~work?}</math> * <math>\int_b^y f(\alpha\,)\,dy,{\rm not~quite,~as~referencing~is~cactus.}</math> * <math>\int_b^y f(\alpha\,)\,dy,cactii eradicated</math> According to scientists, the Sun is pretty big.<ref>E. Miller, The Sun, (New York: Academic Press, 2005), 23-5.</ref> The Moon, however, is not so big.<ref>R. Smith, "Size of the Moon", Scientific American, 46 (April 1978): 44-6.</ref> [[File:green-rectangle.gif | 200px]] <!-- This is a test to see if html commenting works in a wiki. If you can read this then it doesn't work Edit: It works!! --> == MathJax Test == Here is an inline equation: \( x^2 \) Here is a display equation: \begin{align} \int 2x \; dx &= x^2 + C \tag{1}\label{eqn:integral} \end{align} That last equation was Eqn. \ref{eqn:integral}. \( \int_a^y f(\alpha\,)\,dy , \) and in display form \[ \int_a^y f(\alpha\,)\,dy . \] ==Scratch== Therefore, the minimal cost = $50 million <math>\times</math> 360 = $18,000 million = $18 billion. The maximal cost is = $50 million <math>\times</math> 20,300 = $1,016,500 million = $1 trillion (approx). ==Scratch pad downloads== * [http://www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/personal/dabbott/RF.pdf Avionic notes] * [http://www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/personal/dabbott/avionic_exams.xlsx Avionic exam time] * [http://www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/personal/dabbott/test.ppt test download] * [http://www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/personal/dabbott/test1.ppt test1 download] ===Presentations=== * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4P61D6JbgHE * [http://www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/personal/dabbott/Tips.ppt Proposal seminar slides] * [http://www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/personal/dabbott/Proposal_Seminar2014.pdf Proposal seminar slides] * [http://www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/personal/dabbott/Final_Seminar2014.pdf Final seminar slides] * [http://www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/personal/dabbott/video.m4v Final seminar video] ==Notes relating to Test space== <references/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Derek may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Derek:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Infobox
(
edit
)
Template:Infobox/row
(
edit
)
Template:Navbar
(
edit
)
Template:Transclude
(
edit
)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information